On 03/02/2016 17:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 09:33 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> We have to introduce a new object (BlockdevOptionsNbd) for
>> several reasons: - Neither of InetSocketAddress nor
>> UnixSocketAddress alone is sufficient, because both are
>> supported - We cannot use
On 02/03/2016 09:33 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> We have to introduce a new object (BlockdevOptionsNbd) for several
> reasons:
> - Neither of InetSocketAddress nor UnixSocketAddress alone is
> sufficient, because both are supported
> - We cannot use SocketAddress because NBD does not support an fd,
>
We have to introduce a new object (BlockdevOptionsNbd) for several
reasons:
- Neither of InetSocketAddress nor UnixSocketAddress alone is
sufficient, because both are supported
- We cannot use SocketAddress because NBD does not support an fd,
and because it is not a flat union which
On 03.02.2016 17:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 09:33 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> We have to introduce a new object (BlockdevOptionsNbd) for several
>> reasons:
>> - Neither of InetSocketAddress nor UnixSocketAddress alone is
>> sufficient, because both are supported
>> - We cannot use