On Tue 10 Nov 2015 04:44:19 AM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> The information which BB is concerned does not seem useful enough to
> justify its existence in most other place (which may be related to qemu
> printing the -drive parameter in question anyway, and for blockdev-add
> the attribution is
The information which BB is concerned does not seem useful enough to
justify its existence in most other place (which may be related to qemu
printing the -drive parameter in question anyway, and for blockdev-add
the attribution is naturally unambiguous). Furthermore, as of a future
patch,
