On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:33:25PM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:30:56PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is
On 26.06.2015 11:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:33:25PM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:30:56PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
cancelled. The ret
Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is cancelled so it's
not enough to check ret 0.
Reviewed-by: John Snow js...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:30:56PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is cancelled so it's
not enough to check ret 0.
Reviewed-by:
On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is cancelled so it's
not enough to check ret 0.
Reviewed-by: John Snow js...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz
