On 2017-10-24 10:56, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> during discard, signed integer overflow leads to end_offset possibly
> be less than offset,
> that in turn makes nb_clusters (to discard) much bigger than expected,
> leading to a possible data loss, operation taking very long and
> image growing large
during discard, signed integer overflow leads to end_offset possibly
be less than offset,
that in turn makes nb_clusters (to discard) much bigger than expected,
leading to a possible data loss, operation taking very long and
image growing large as discard will allocate L2 tables for all that
huge
