Am 30.11.2015 um 15:51 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Mon 23 Nov 2015 04:59:42 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> > @@ -370,11 +371,22 @@ static void mirror_exit(BlockJob *job, void *opaque)
> > if (s->to_replace) {
> > to_replace = s->to_replace;
> > }
> > +
> > +
On Mon 23 Nov 2015 04:59:42 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> @@ -370,11 +371,22 @@ static void mirror_exit(BlockJob *job, void *opaque)
> if (s->to_replace) {
> to_replace = s->to_replace;
> }
> +
> +/* This was checked in mirror_start_job(), but meanwhile one of
On 23.11.2015 16:59, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_replace_in_backing_chain() asserts that not both old and new
> BlockDdriverState have a BlockBackend attached to them because both
> would have to end up pointing to the new BDS and we don't support more
> than one BB per BDS yet.
>
> Before we can
bdrv_replace_in_backing_chain() asserts that not both old and new
BlockDdriverState have a BlockBackend attached to them because both
would have to end up pointing to the new BDS and we don't support more
than one BB per BDS yet.
Before we can safely allow references to existing nodes as backing
