On 06/21/2016 07:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.06.2016 um 23:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
>> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
>> and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suf
Am 14.06.2016 um 23:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
> and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suffix)
> so that the compiler will help us catch
On Tue, 06/14 15:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
> and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suffix)
> so that the compiler will help us catch the change i
Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suffix)
so that the compiler will help us catch the change in semantics
across any rebased code, and improv