On 2018-02-01 11:40, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed 31 Jan 2018 09:11:48 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 2018-01-26 15:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>>> After the previous patch we're now always using l2_load() in
>>> get_cluster_table() regardless of whether a new L2 table has to be
>>> allocated or no
On Wed 31 Jan 2018 09:11:48 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-01-26 15:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> After the previous patch we're now always using l2_load() in
>> get_cluster_table() regardless of whether a new L2 table has to be
>> allocated or not.
>>
>> This patch refactors that part of the c
On 2018-01-26 15:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> After the previous patch we're now always using l2_load() in
> get_cluster_table() regardless of whether a new L2 table has to be
> allocated or not.
>
> This patch refactors that part of the code to use one single l2_load()
> call.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 01/26/2018 08:59 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> After the previous patch we're now always using l2_load() in
> get_cluster_table() regardless of whether a new L2 table has to be
> allocated or not.
>
> This patch refactors that part of the code to use one single l2_load()
> call.
>
> Signed-off-b
After the previous patch we're now always using l2_load() in
get_cluster_table() regardless of whether a new L2 table has to be
allocated or not.
This patch refactors that part of the code to use one single l2_load()
call.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
---
block/qcow2-cluster.c | 21 +++
