Am 06.10.2015 um 17:49 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Tue 06 Oct 2015 05:30:07 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> -options = qdict_new();
> >> -if (has_snapshot_node_name) {
> >> -qdict_put(options, "node-name",
> >> - qstring_from_str(snapshot_node_name));
> >>
On Tue 06 Oct 2015 05:30:07 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> -options = qdict_new();
>> -if (has_snapshot_node_name) {
>> -qdict_put(options, "node-name",
>> - qstring_from_str(snapshot_node_name));
>> +if (snapshot_node_name &&
Am 22.09.2015 um 15:28 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> One of the limitations of the 'blockdev-snapshot-sync' command is that
> it does not allow passing BlockdevOptions to the newly created
> snapshots, so they are always opened using the default values.
>
> Extending the command to allow
On Tue 22 Sep 2015 06:38:27 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
>> +.name = "blockdev-snapshot",
>> +.args_type = "node:s,overlay:s",
>> +.mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_blockdev_snapshot,
>
> As of 7fad30f06eb6aa57aaa8f3d264288f24ae7646f0, this needs to be
>
One of the limitations of the 'blockdev-snapshot-sync' command is that
it does not allow passing BlockdevOptions to the newly created
snapshots, so they are always opened using the default values.
Extending the command to allow passing options is not a practical
solution because there is overlap
