On Wed 31 Jan 2018 06:11:27 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> On 31/1/2018 6:11 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu 18 Jan 2018 06:49:02 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
>>
>>> -static bool coroutine_fn wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest
>>> *self)
>>> +static bool coroutine_fn
On Thu 18 Jan 2018 06:49:02 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> -static bool coroutine_fn wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self)
> +static bool coroutine_fn wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self,
> + bool nowait)
It's a bit
On 29/1/2018 10:48 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2018-01-18 18:49, Anton Nefedov wrote:
The idea is that ALLOCATE requests may overlap with other requests.
Reuse the existing block layer infrastructure for serialising requests.
Use the following approach:
- mark ALLOCATE serialising, so
On 2018-01-18 18:49, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> The idea is that ALLOCATE requests may overlap with other requests.
> Reuse the existing block layer infrastructure for serialising requests.
> Use the following approach:
> - mark ALLOCATE serialising, so subsequent requests to the area wait
> -
The idea is that ALLOCATE requests may overlap with other requests.
Reuse the existing block layer infrastructure for serialising requests.
Use the following approach:
- mark ALLOCATE serialising, so subsequent requests to the area wait
- ALLOCATE request itself must never wait if another
