On 7/31/19 6:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 30.07.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Here are two small fixes.
>>>
>>> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
>>> 02 is degradation of 3.0,
On 7/31/19 6:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 30.07.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Here are two small fixes.
>>>
>>> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
>>> 02 is degradation of 3.0,
30.07.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Here are two small fixes.
>>
>> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
>> 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too,
>> but it seems to be real bug
On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Here are two small fixes.
>
> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
> 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too,
>but it seems to be real bug and fix is very simple, so,
>may be 4.1 is