Am 21.08.2015 um 08:12 schrieb Eric Blake:
On 08/20/2015 01:14 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
If the backend storage is unresponsive and we cancel a request due to
a timeout we cannot immediately destroy the AIOCB because the storage
might complete the original request laster if it is responsive again.
On 08/20/2015 01:14 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> If the backend storage is unresponsive and we cancel a request due to
> a timeout we cannot immediately destroy the AIOCB because the storage
> might complete the original request laster if it is responsive again.
s/laster/later/
> For this purpose al
