23.08.2019 17:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> When creating a read-only image, we are still advertising support for
> TRIM and WRITE_ZEROES to the client, even though the client should not
> be issuing those commands. But seeing this requires looking across
> multiple functions:
>
> All callers to nbd_ex
On 8/30/19 6:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
@@ -458,10 +458,13 @@ static int
nbd_negotiate_handle_export_name(NBDClient *client,
return -EINVAL;
}
-trace_nbd_negotiate_new_style_size_flags(client->exp->size,
-
On 8/30/19 6:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/30/19 1:00 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 23.08.2019 17:37, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> When creating a read-only image, we are still advertising support for
>>> TRIM and WRITE_ZEROES to the client, even though the client should not
>>> be issuing
On 8/30/19 1:00 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 23.08.2019 17:37, Eric Blake wrote:
>> When creating a read-only image, we are still advertising support for
>> TRIM and WRITE_ZEROES to the client, even though the client should not
>> be issuing those commands. But seeing this requires lo
23.08.2019 17:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> When creating a read-only image, we are still advertising support for
> TRIM and WRITE_ZEROES to the client, even though the client should not
> be issuing those commands. But seeing this requires looking across
> multiple functions:
>
> All callers to nbd_ex
