On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:24:38PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 05/26 10:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:51:23AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Tue, 05/19 15:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51:01AM +, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > > This
On Tue, 05/26 10:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:51:23AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Tue, 05/19 15:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51:01AM +, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > This callback is called by main loop before polling s->fd, if it returns
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:51:23AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 05/19 15:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51:01AM +, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > This callback is called by main loop before polling s->fd, if it returns
> > > false, the fd will not be polled in this itera
On Tue, 05/19 15:54, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51:01AM +, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > This callback is called by main loop before polling s->fd, if it returns
> > false, the fd will not be polled in this iteration.
> >
> > This is redundant with checks inside read callback.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51:01AM +, Fam Zheng wrote:
> This callback is called by main loop before polling s->fd, if it returns
> false, the fd will not be polled in this iteration.
>
> This is redundant with checks inside read callback. After this patch,
> the data will be copied from s->fd
