On 29.12.2015 01:27, Programmingkid wrote:
> I do realize you are busy Kevin, but I would
> appreciate knowing my patch is in line
> for review.
Primarily, he's been on holiday since before christmas until next week.
(I'm telling you so you don't wonder why nothing happens.)
Max
On Jan 4, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 29.12.2015 01:27, Programmingkid wrote:
>> I do realize you are busy Kevin, but I would
>> appreciate knowing my patch is in line
>> for review.
>
> Primarily, he's been on holiday since before christmas until next week.
>
> (I'm telling you
I do realize you are busy Kevin, but I would
appreciate knowing my patch is in line
for review.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/555945/
On Dec 11, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
> Mac OS X can be picky when it comes to allowing the user
> to use physical devices in QEMU. Most
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/555945/
On Dec 11, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
> Mac OS X can be picky when it comes to allowing the user
> to use physical devices in QEMU. Most mounted volumes
> appear to be off limits to QEMU. If an issue is detected,
> a message is displayed
