Am 19.07.2021 um 11:29 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:23:50PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 13.07.2021 um 15:10 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > AIO_WAIT_WHILE() requires that AioContext is acquired according to its
> > > documentation, but I'm not sure
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:23:50PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 13.07.2021 um 15:10 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > AIO_WAIT_WHILE() requires that AioContext is acquired according to its
> > documentation, but I'm not sure that's true anymore. Thread-safe/atomic
> > primitives are used by
Am 13.07.2021 um 15:10 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE() requires that AioContext is acquired according to its
> documentation, but I'm not sure that's true anymore. Thread-safe/atomic
> primitives are used by AIO_WAIT_WHILE(), so as long as the condition
> being waited for is
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 03:35:37PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.07.2021 19:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:18:39PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > 13.07.2021 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:41:46AM
13.07.2021 19:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:18:39PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
13.07.2021 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
On 08/07/2021 15:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:18:39PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.07.2021 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/07/2021 15:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at
13.07.2021 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
On 08/07/2021 15:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
What is very clear from
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:42:47AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> On 08/07/2021 15:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> > > This is a continuation on the work to reduce (and possibly get rid of)
> > > the usage of
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2021 15:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > > What is very clear from this patch is that it
On 08/07/2021 15:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
This is a continuation on the work to reduce (and possibly get rid of) the
usage of AioContext lock, by introducing smaller granularity locks to keep the
thread safety.
On 08/07/2021 15:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
What is very clear from this patch is that it
is strictly related to the brdv_* and lower level calls, because
they also internally check or
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> This is a continuation on the work to reduce (and possibly get rid of) the
> usage of AioContext lock, by introducing smaller granularity locks to keep
> the thread safety.
>
> This series aims to:
> 1) remove the
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > What is very clear from this patch is that it
> > > is strictly related to the brdv_* and lower level calls, because
> > > they also internally check or even use the aiocontext lock.
>
Am 08.07.2021 um 13:32 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > What is very clear from this patch is that it
> > > is strictly related to the brdv_* and lower level calls, because
> > > they also internally check or even use the aiocontext lock.
> > >
On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
What is very clear from this patch is that it
is strictly related to the brdv_* and lower level calls, because
they also internally check or even use the aiocontext lock.
Therefore, in order to make it work, I temporarly added some
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> This is a continuation on the work to reduce (and possibly get rid of) the
> usage of AioContext lock, by introducing smaller granularity locks to keep
> the thread safety.
>
> This series aims to:
> 1) remove the
This is a continuation on the work to reduce (and possibly get rid of) the
usage of AioContext lock, by introducing smaller granularity locks to keep the
thread safety.
This series aims to:
1) remove the aiocontext lock and substitute it with the already existing
global job_mutex
2) fix what
17 matches
Mail list logo
