Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 28.11.2019 11:54, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few
>> thoughts before I dig deeper.
>>
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> At the request of Markus: full version
28.11.2019 11:54, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few
> thoughts before I dig deeper.
>
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look
>> at it. Cover
Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few
thoughts before I dig deeper.
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> Hi all!
>
> At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look
> at it. Cover as much as possible, except inserting macro invocation
>
Am 20.11.2019 um 13:59 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 11/20/19 3:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Okay...
> >
> > I think that:
> >
> > 1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded
> > generation efforts)
> > are made, it would be sad to lose them.
On 11/20/19 3:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Okay...
I think that:
1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded
generation efforts)
are made, it would be sad to lose them.
2. It's safe enough to apply only part of generated patches: we just fix
Okay...
I think that:
1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded
generation efforts)
are made, it would be sad to lose them.
2. It's safe enough to apply only part of generated patches: we just fix
error_abort/error_fatal
in more popular subsystems, what's
12.11.2019 16:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:57:25 +0400
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally, what is the plan?
>>>
>>> Markus what do you think?
>>>
>>> Now a lot of patches are
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:57:25 +0400
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> wrote:
> >
> > Finally, what is the plan?
> >
> > Markus what do you think?
> >
> > Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not.
> >
> > Is there any
Hi
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
wrote:
>
> Finally, what is the plan?
>
> Markus what do you think?
>
> Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not.
>
> Is there any hope that all patches will be reviewed? Should I resend the
> whole series, or may be
Finally, what is the plan?
Markus what do you think?
Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not.
Is there any hope that all patches will be reviewed? Should I resend the
whole series, or may be reduce it to reviewed subsystems only?
11.10.2019 19:03, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
12.10.2019 5:10, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL:
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191011160552.22907-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com/
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the
> testing commands and
> their output below. If you have Docker
12.10.2019 5:52, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL:
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191011160552.22907-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com/
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> more information:
>
> Subj
11.10.2019 20:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/11/19 11:03 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look
>> at it. Cover as much as possible, except inserting macro invocation
>> where it's not necessary.
>>
>> It's
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191011160552.22907-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Subject: [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err
Type: series
Message-id: 20191011160552.22907-1
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191011160552.22907-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com/
Hi,
This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT
On 10/11/19 11:03 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look
at it. Cover as much as possible, except inserting macro invocation
where it's not necessary.
It's huge, and so it's an RFC.
Is there a repo containing
Hi all!
At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look
at it. Cover as much as possible, except inserting macro invocation
where it's not necessary.
It's huge, and so it's an RFC.
In v5 I've added a lot more preparation cleanups:
01-23 are preparation cleanups
01: not
17 matches
Mail list logo
