Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 02.05.23 um 12:35 schrieb Juan Quintela: > Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 02.05.23 um 12:03 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >>> Am 28.04.23 um 18:54 schrieb Juan Quintela: Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: >> Kevin Wolf wrote: I am perhaps a bit

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 02.05.23 um 12:03 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> Am 28.04.23 um 18:54 schrieb Juan Quintela: >>> Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: > Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 28.04.23 um 18:54 schrieb Juan Quintela: >> Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: Kevin Wolf wrote: >> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince >> qemu that snapshot_save_job_bh *HAS* to run

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 02.05.23 um 12:03 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 28.04.23 um 18:54 schrieb Juan Quintela: >> Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: Kevin Wolf wrote: >> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince >> qemu that

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 28.04.23 um 18:54 schrieb Juan Quintela: > Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: >>> Kevin Wolf wrote: > I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince > qemu that snapshot_save_job_bh *HAS* to run on the main thread?

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: >> Kevin Wolf wrote: >> >> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince >> >> qemu that snapshot_save_job_bh *HAS* to run on the main thread? >> > >> > I believe we're talking about a technicality

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 28.04.2023 um 10:38 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: > Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince > >> qemu that snapshot_save_job_bh *HAS* to run on the main thread? > > > > I believe we're talking about a technicality here. I asked another more

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Kevin Wolf wrote: >> >> I am perhaps a bit ingenuous here, but it is there a way to convince >> qemu that snapshot_save_job_bh *HAS* to run on the main thread? > > I believe we're talking about a technicality here. I asked another more > fundamental question that nobody has answered yet: > >

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 28.04.2023 um 09:47 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: > Fiona Ebner wrote: > > Am 27.04.23 um 16:36 schrieb Juan Quintela: > >> Fiona Ebner wrote: > >>> Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: > Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > > Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 27.04.23 um 16:56 schrieb Peter Xu: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Fiona Ebner wrote: >>> Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> >> Hi >> >>> Our

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 27.04.23 um 16:36 schrieb Juan Quintela: >> Fiona Ebner wrote: >>> Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> >> Hi >> >>> Our function is a custom variant of

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 27.04.23 um 16:36 schrieb Juan Quintela: > Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: >>> Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > Hi > >> Our function is a custom variant of saving a snapshot and uses >>

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > Fiona Ebner wrote: > > Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: > >> Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > >>> Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > Hi > > > Our function is a custom variant of saving a

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: >> Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: >>> Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: Hi > Our function is a custom variant of saving a snapshot and uses > qemu_savevm_state_setup(), which is why the

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 27.04.23 um 13:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf: > Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: >> Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>> >>> >>> Il gio 20 apr 2023, 08:11 Markus Armbruster >> > ha scritto: >>> >>> So, splicing in a bottom half unmoored

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 26.04.2023 um 16:31 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > > > > Il gio 20 apr 2023, 08:11 Markus Armbruster > > ha scritto: > > > > So, splicing in a bottom half unmoored monitor commands from the main > > loop. 

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Am 20.04.23 um 08:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > Il gio 20 apr 2023, 08:11 Markus Armbruster > ha scritto: > > So, splicing in a bottom half unmoored monitor commands from the main > loop.  We weren't aware of that, as our commit messages show. > > I

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Il gio 20 apr 2023, 08:11 Markus Armbruster ha scritto: > So, splicing in a bottom half unmoored monitor commands from the main > loop. We weren't aware of that, as our commit messages show. > > I guess the commands themselves don't care; all they need is the BQL. > > However, did we

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Fiona Ebner writes: > Hi, > while debugging a completely different issue, I was surprised to see > do_qmp_dispatch_bh being run in a vCPU thread. I was under the > impression that QMP functions are supposed to be executed in the main > thread. Is that wrong? > > I managed to reproduced the

Re: QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Il mer 19 apr 2023, 16:11 Fiona Ebner ha scritto: Hi, while debugging a completely different issue, I was surprised to see do_qmp_dispatch_bh being run in a vCPU thread. I was under the impression that QMP functions are supposed to be executed in the main thread. Is that wrong While monitor

QMP (without OOB) function running in thread different from the main thread as part of aio_poll

Hi, while debugging a completely different issue, I was surprised to see do_qmp_dispatch_bh being run in a vCPU thread. I was under the impression that QMP functions are supposed to be executed in the main thread. Is that wrong? I managed to reproduced the scenario with a build of upstream QEMU