31.03.2020 11:34, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 31.03.2020 11:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
31.03.2020 10:55, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 31.03.2020 09:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 18:04, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
On 31.03.2020 11:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
31.03.2020 10:55, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 31.03.2020 09:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 18:04, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis
31.03.2020 10:55, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 31.03.2020 09:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 18:04, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression
On 31.03.2020 09:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 18:04, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression
30.03.2020 18:04, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in
On 30.03.2020 16:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment,
30.03.2020 12:54, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
method available.
The performance
