On 07/31/2017 12:17 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:54:57AM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 07/31/2017 11:38 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
bs0 is
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:54:57AM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 11:38 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
> >>bs0 is always non-NULL; initially,
Am 31.07.2017 um 16:54 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On 07/31/2017 11:38 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
> > > bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because
On 07/31/2017 11:38 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because it's taken from a BdrvChild
Not to mention, we deference bs0 in the chunk of
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
> bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because it's taken from a BdrvChild
Not to mention, we deference bs0 in the chunk of code right above this, so
we'd segfault
Am 31.07.2017 um 16:00 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/31/2017 08:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 07/31/2017 07:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> In the subject line, s/redundat/redundant/
Thanks, I'll fix this.
Kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 07/31/2017 08:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 07:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
In the subject line, s/redundat/redundant/
>> When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
>> bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because it's taken from a BdrvChild
>> and a BdrvChild
On 07/31/2017 07:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
> bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because it's taken from a BdrvChild
> and a BdrvChild never has a NULL bs, and after the first iteration
> because implicit nodes always have a
