06.08.2020 22:35, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
As __dict__ is being extended with class members we do not want to
print, add the to_dict() method to classes that returns a dictionary
to_json() ... that returns a json-dumpable object
with desired fields and their values. Extend it in subclass
07.08.2020 11:03, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
On 07.08.2020 09:30, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
06.08.2020 22:35, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
As __dict__ is being extended with class members we do not want to
print, add the to_dict() method to classes that returns a dictionary
to_json() ...
On 07.08.2020 09:30, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
06.08.2020 22:35, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
As __dict__ is being extended with class members we do not want to
print, add the to_dict() method to classes that returns a dictionary
to_json() ... that returns a json-dumpable object
New
On 8/6/2020 5:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 05.08.2020 um 04:38 hat Ying Fang geschrieben:
From: fangying
When qemu or qemu-nbd process uses a qcow2 image and configured with
'cache = none', it will write to the qcow2 image with a cache to cache
L2 tables, however the process will not use L2
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 03:45:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/08/20 15:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > +atomic_set(>notified, false);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Write ctx->notified before reading e.g. bh->flags. Pairs with
> > smp_mb in
> > + * aio_notify.
> > + */
> > +
This is just a sketch. It's incomplete, needs comments and a real
commit message.
Support for "[PATCH v6 09/12] hmp: Add support for coroutine command
handlers" is missing. Marked FIXME.
As is, it goes on top of Kevin's series. It is meant to be squashed
into PATCH 06, except for the FIXME,
I called for a discussion of design alternatives, because I dislike the
one I got. Here we go.
= Context: the "current monitor" =
Output of HMP commands needs to go to the HMP monitor executing the
command. Trivial in HMP command handlers: the handler function takes a
monitor argument. Not so
This is just a sketch. It needs comments and a real commit message.
As is, it goes on top of Kevin's series. It is meant to be squashed
into PATCH 06.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster
---
include/qemu/coroutine.h | 4
include/qemu/coroutine_int.h | 2 ++
monitor/monitor.c
16.07.2020 17:59, Max Reitz wrote:
On 10.07.20 19:41, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
On 10.07.2020 18:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 09.07.20 16:52, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
On 25.06.2020 18:21, Max Reitz wrote:
Because of the (not so recent anymore) changes that make the stream job
independent of the
25.06.2020 18:21, Max Reitz wrote:
bdrv_has_zero_init() and the related bdrv_unallocated_blocks_are_zero()
should use bdrv_cow_child() if they want to check whether the given BDS
has a COW backing file.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
block/vhdx uses qemu block layer where sector size is always 512 bytes.
This may have issues with 4K logical sector sized vhdx image.
For e.g qemu-img convert on such images fails with following assert:
$qemu-img convert -f vhdx -O raw 4KTest1.vhdx test.raw
qemu-img: util/iov.c:388: qiov_slice:
Am 07.08.2020 um 09:42 hat Ying Fang geschrieben:
>
>
> On 8/6/2020 5:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 05.08.2020 um 04:38 hat Ying Fang geschrieben:
> > > From: fangying
> > >
> > > When qemu or qemu-nbd process uses a qcow2 image and configured with
> > > 'cache = none', it will write to the
28.07.2020 19:09, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
On 2020-07-13 at 11:06 CEST, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote...
25.06.2020 18:21, Max Reitz wrote:
There are BDS children that the general block layer code can access,
namely bs->file and bs->backing. Since the introduction of filters and
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/1596794594-44531-1-git-send-email-swapnil.in...@nutanix.com/
Hi,
This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
===
On 8/5/20 4:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 20:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The struct had a single field (IDEDevice dev), and is only used
in the QOM type declarations and property lists. We can simply
use the IDEDevice struct directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo
15 matches
Mail list logo
