[Qemu-block] [PATCH] qcow2: do lazy allocation of the L2 cache

2015-04-21 Thread Alberto Garcia
Large disk images need large L2 caches in order to maximize their I/O performance. However setting a correct size for the cache is not necessarily easy since apart from the image size, it also depends on other factors like its usage patterns or whether it's part of a backing chain. In order to be

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2.5 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions

2015-04-21 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] And, invoking `drive-backup` *without* pre-creating the target image (i.e. 'incremental.o.img'): { 'execute': 'drive-backup', 'arguments': { 'device': 'ide0-0-0', Small typo (in this email, not

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH COLO v3 01/14] docs: block replication's description

2015-04-21 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 21/04/2015 03:25, Wen Congyang wrote: Please do not introduce name+colo block drivers. This approach is invasive and makes block replication specific to only a few block drivers, e.g. NBD or qcow2. NBD is used to connect to secondary qemu, so it must be used. But the primary qemu

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2.5 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions

2015-04-21 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:01:10PM -0400, John Snow wrote: I am not prepared to send a v3 on this, primarily because I am still waffling on whether or not to do the code motion patch that is present in patch #8 of v2 of this series. However, for the purposes of testing, reviewers may find it

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2.5 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions

2015-04-21 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] And, invoking `drive-backup` *without* pre-creating the target image (i.e. 'incremental.o.img'): { 'execute': 'drive-backup', 'arguments': { 'device': 'ide0-0-0', 'bitmap': 'bitmap0',