Dear Paolo
This is a ping for the following.
If you don't mind, could you give me some feedback?
Thank you very much.
Jeuk
On 23. 9. 21. 17:38, Jeuk Kim wrote:
Dear Paolo
Hi. I've been looking into how ufs-lu can share code with scsi-hd.
I have verified that ufs-lu can use scsi-hd's code,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:11:39PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 26.09.2023 15:05, Niklas Cassel:
> > Hello Marcin,
> >
> > I will have a look at this.
>
> Hi Marcin, Hi Niklas!
>
> Niklas, I remember asking you if the whole thing is okay for the -stable,
> and you was a bit unsure about it
26.09.2023 15:05, Niklas Cassel:
Hello Marcin,
I will have a look at this.
Hi Marcin, Hi Niklas!
Niklas, I remember asking you if the whole thing is okay for the -stable,
and you was a bit unsure about it :) Regardless, I picked the changes
up for -stable. I don't think it was anyone's
While I'm poking at IDE today ... any news here?
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, 12:35 PM John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023, 8:06 AM Niklas Cassel wrote:
>
>> Hello Marcin,
>>
>> I will have a look at this.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Niklas
>>
>
> Thanks. You have my blessing in advance to get
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, 10:07 AM Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:53:23PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > Niklas, I'm sorry to lean on you here a little bit - You've been
> > working on the SATA side of this a bit more often, can you let me know
> > if you think this patch is safe?
>
>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:53:23PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> Niklas, I'm sorry to lean on you here a little bit - You've been
> working on the SATA side of this a bit more often, can you let me know
> if you think this patch is safe?
FWIW, I prefer Fiona's patch series which calls
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:16:02PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> virtio-blk and virtio-scsi devices need a way to specify the mapping between
> IOThreads and virtqueues. At the moment all virtqueues are assigned to a
> single
> IOThread or the main loop. This single thread can be a CPU
On Monday, 2 October 2023 John Snow wrote:
> Which reset pathway are you testing that causes the problem?
The test centres on a VM-initiated bus reset because a DMA write has stalled (I
deliberately discard the iSCSI response).
> I'm not fully clear on why checking for DRQ is legitimate here.
On 03.08.23 05:43, Evanzhang wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
index d3cacd1708..cd19b49f7f 100644
--- a/block/mirror.c
+++ b/block/mirror.c
@@ -1143,6 +1143,10 @@ immediate_exit:
g_free(s->in_flight_bitmap);
bdrv_dirty_iter_free(s->dbi);
+if (ret >= 0) {
On 19.09.23 13:02, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for the review
On 9/12/23 21:29, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 04.09.23 11:31, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
Unlike other transaction commands, bitmap operations do not drain target
bds. If we have an IOThread, this may result in
10 matches
Mail list logo
