On 11/16/21 10:29, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Cédric Le Goater writes:
On 11/15/21 16:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
backend of a certain
Cédric Le Goater writes:
> On 11/15/21 16:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
>>
>>> On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means
On 11/15/21 16:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
subsequent calls count N up
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> On 11/15/21 16:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
>>> On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means
On 11/15/21 16:57, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
>> On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
>>> backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
>>> subsequent calls
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
>> backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
>> subsequent calls count N up from zero, per interface type.
>>
>>
On 11/15/21 13:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
> backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
> subsequent calls count N up from zero, per interface type.
>
> This lets you define unit numbers
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 12:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
>> backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
>> subsequent calls count N up from zero, per interface type.
>>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 12:55, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
> backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
> subsequent calls count N up from zero, per interface type.
>
> This lets you define unit
drive_get_next() is basically a bad idea. It returns the "next" block
backend of a certain interface type. "Next" means bus=0,unit=N, where
subsequent calls count N up from zero, per interface type.
This lets you define unit numbers implicitly by execution order. If the
order changes, or new
10 matches
Mail list logo