Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block jobs: Improve error message for missing job ID

2016-08-17 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 16.08.2016 um 16:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben: > If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and > no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a > well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little > bit nicer. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block jobs: Improve error message for missing job ID

2016-08-17 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and > no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a > well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little > bit nicer. > >

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block jobs: Improve error message for missing job ID

2016-08-16 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 04:02:10 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote: > If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and > no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a "it was" ? > well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little > bit nicer. > >

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block jobs: Improve error message for missing job ID

2016-08-16 Thread Jeff Cody
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and > no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a > well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little > bit nicer. > >

[Qemu-block] [PATCH] block jobs: Improve error message for missing job ID

2016-08-16 Thread Kevin Wolf
If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little bit nicer. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- blockjob.c | 4 1 file