Am 16.08.2016 um 16:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
> no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
> well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
> bit nicer.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
> no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
> well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
> bit nicer.
>
>
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 04:02:10 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
> no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
"it was" ?
> well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
> bit nicer.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
> no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
> well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
> bit nicer.
>
>
If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
bit nicer.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
blockjob.c | 4
1 file