Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 18.10.2016 um 11:36 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben: > Am 17.10.2016 um 19:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > > On 28.09.2016 22:46, Max Reitz wrote: > > > 162 is potentially racy and makes some invalid assumptions about what > > > should happen when connecting to a non-existing domain name. This series

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-23 Thread Hao QingFeng
在 2016-10-16 1:27, Max Reitz 写道: On 13.10.2016 07:20, Hao QingFeng wrote: 在 2016-10-13 3:46, Max Reitz 写道: On 12.10.2016 10:55, Hao QingFeng wrote: Max, Just a common question for this case, if sshx block driver wasn't built into qemu-img, this case would fail as below: Good point, and th

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-18 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 17.10.2016 um 19:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 28.09.2016 22:46, Max Reitz wrote: > > 162 is potentially racy and makes some invalid assumptions about what > > should happen when connecting to a non-existing domain name. This series > > fixes both issues. > > > > > > v4: > > - Added docum

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-17 Thread Max Reitz
On 28.09.2016 22:46, Max Reitz wrote: > 162 is potentially racy and makes some invalid assumptions about what > should happen when connecting to a non-existing domain name. This series > fixes both issues. > > > v4: > - Added documentation for the new --fork option [Kevin] > > > git-backport-di

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-15 Thread Max Reitz
On 13.10.2016 07:20, Hao QingFeng wrote: > > > 在 2016-10-13 3:46, Max Reitz 写道: >> On 12.10.2016 10:55, Hao QingFeng wrote: >>> Max, >>> >>> Just a common question for this case, if sshx block driver wasn't built >>> into qemu-img, this case would fail as below: >> Good point, and thanks for brin

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-12 Thread Hao QingFeng
在 2016-10-13 3:46, Max Reitz 写道: On 12.10.2016 10:55, Hao QingFeng wrote: Max, Just a common question for this case, if sshx block driver wasn't built into qemu-img, this case would fail as below: Good point, and thanks for bringing it up, but it's not directly linked to this series other th

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-12 Thread Max Reitz
On 12.10.2016 10:55, Hao QingFeng wrote: > Max, > > Just a common question for this case, if sshx block driver wasn't built > into qemu-img, this case would fail as below: Good point, and thanks for bringing it up, but it's not directly linked to this series other than by its subject, of course,

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-10-12 Thread Hao QingFeng
Max, Just a common question for this case, if sshx block driver wasn't built into qemu-img, this case would fail as below: exec /home/haoqf/KVMonz/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-img info --image-opts driver=ssh,host=localhost,port=0.42,path=/foo qemu-img: Could not open 'driver=ssh,host=

[Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 0/3] iotests: Fix test 162

2016-09-28 Thread Max Reitz
162 is potentially racy and makes some invalid assumptions about what should happen when connecting to a non-existing domain name. This series fixes both issues. v4: - Added documentation for the new --fork option [Kevin] git-backport-diff against v3: Key: [] : patches are identical []