Am 18.09.2015 um 17:22 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> blk_bs() will not necessarily return a non-NULL value any more (unless
> blk_is_available() is true or it can be assumed to otherwise, e.g.
> because it is called immediately after a successful blk_new_with_bs() or
> blk_new_open()).
>
>
On 09/18/2015 09:22 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> blk_bs() will not necessarily return a non-NULL value any more (unless
> blk_is_available() is true or it can be assumed to otherwise, e.g.
> because it is called immediately after a successful blk_new_with_bs() or
> blk_new_open()).
>
> Signed-off-by:
blk_bs() will not necessarily return a non-NULL value any more (unless
blk_is_available() is true or it can be assumed to otherwise, e.g.
because it is called immediately after a successful blk_new_with_bs() or
blk_new_open()).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block.c