On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:20:28PM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:26:53PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 04/05/2017 02:20 PM, John Snow wrote:
> >
> > > Conceptually straightforward.
> > >
> > > looks like this might change behavior for... RBD and vvfat, right?
> > > RBD
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:26:53PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 02:20 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
> > Conceptually straightforward.
> >
> > looks like this might change behavior for... RBD and vvfat, right?
> > RBD is the subject of this series so we'll just assume that was broken
> > and
On 04/05/2017 02:20 PM, John Snow wrote:
> Conceptually straightforward.
>
> looks like this might change behavior for... RBD and vvfat, right?
> RBD is the subject of this series so we'll just assume that was broken
> and stupid.
>
> What's vvfat's story? It always set the read-only property
On 04/05/2017 02:28 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> The BDRV_O_ALLOW_RDWR flag allows / prohibits the changing of
> the BDS 'read_only' state, but there are a few places where it
> is ignored. In the bdrv_set_read_only() helper, make sure to
> honor the flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody