Am 07.12.2015 um 20:44 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> I'd be completely fine with adding an "else { abort(); }" branch to
> qcow2_get_specific_info().
This is actually what I was going to suggest, too. Of course, it's not
supposed to fix anything now, but defensive coding has never hurt.
Kevin
On 07.12.2015 19:11, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 08:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 12/07/2015 10:51 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> [adding qemu-devel - ALL patches should go to qemu-devel, even if they
>>> are also going to a sub-list like qemu-block]
>>>
>>> On 12/07/2015 10:07 AM, Roman
On 12/07/2015 10:51 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding qemu-devel - ALL patches should go to qemu-devel, even if they
> are also going to a sub-list like qemu-block]
>
> On 12/07/2015 10:07 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
>> qcow2_get_specific_info() used to have a code path which would leave
>> pointer to
On 12/07/2015 08:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/07/2015 10:51 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
[adding qemu-devel - ALL patches should go to qemu-devel, even if they
are also going to a sub-list like qemu-block]
On 12/07/2015 10:07 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
qcow2_get_specific_info() used to have a code
