On 17.08.19 00:07, John Snow wrote:
> Hi Max, I took your patch and adjusted it slightly: I don't like
> "skip_bytes" anymore because it's clear now that we don't only read that
> value when we're skipping bytes, so now it's just status_bytes.
Yep, sure.
> Since this is based on your fixup, would
Hi Max, I took your patch and adjusted it slightly: I don't like
"skip_bytes" anymore because it's clear now that we don't only read that
value when we're skipping bytes, so now it's just status_bytes.
Since this is based on your fixup, would you like to offer an
Ack/S-o-b/R-B/whichever here?
--j
