On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:04 PM Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/17/19 8:31 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >>> Also, for qemu-nbd, shouldn't we allow -e only together with -r ?
> >>
> >> I'm reluctant to; it might break whatever existing user is okay exposing
> >> it (although such users are questionable, so
17.08.2019 17:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/16/19 5:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
+++ b/blockdev-nbd.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void qmp_nbd_server_add(const char *device, bool
has_name, const char *name,
}
exp = nbd_export_new(bs, 0, len,
On 8/17/19 8:31 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> Also, for qemu-nbd, shouldn't we allow -e only together with -r ?
>>
>> I'm reluctant to; it might break whatever existing user is okay exposing
>> it (although such users are questionable, so maybe we can argue they
>> were already broken). Maybe it's
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:30 PM Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/16/19 5:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
> >>> +++ b/blockdev-nbd.c
> >>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void qmp_nbd_server_add(const char *device, bool
> has_name, const char *name,
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> exp =
On 8/16/19 5:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> +++ b/blockdev-nbd.c
>>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void qmp_nbd_server_add(const char *device, bool
>>> has_name, const char *name,
>>> }
>>>
>>> exp = nbd_export_new(bs, 0, len, name, NULL, bitmap,
>>> -
16.08.2019 13:23, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 15.08.2019 21:50, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
>> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
>> simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
15.08.2019 21:50, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
> simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
> flush from one client are able to guarantee for reads
On 8/15/19 5:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/15/19 4:45 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/19 2:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
>>> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
>>> simultaneous clients
On 8/15/19 4:45 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 8/15/19 2:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
>> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
>> simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
>> flush
On 8/15/19 2:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
> simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
> flush from one client are able to guarantee for
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
> advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
> simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
> flush from one client are able to
The NBD specification defines NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN, which can be
advertised when the server promises cache consistency between
simultaneous clients (basically, rules that determine what FUA and
flush from one client are able to guarantee for reads from another
client). When we don't permit
12 matches
Mail list logo
