On Fri 09 Mar 2018 01:54:31 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-03-08 08:44, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed 07 Mar 2018 06:54:51 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
v4: Mention that commit 1a63a907507fbbcfaee3f622907ec24 also
contributes to solve the original bug (both commits need to
On 2018-03-08 08:44, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed 07 Mar 2018 06:54:51 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> v4: Mention that commit 1a63a907507fbbcfaee3f622907ec24 also
>>> contributes to solve the original bug (both commits need to
>>> reverted in order to reproduce this bug reliably).
>>>
>>>
On Wed 07 Mar 2018 06:54:51 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> v4: Mention that commit 1a63a907507fbbcfaee3f622907ec24 also
>> contributes to solve the original bug (both commits need to
>> reverted in order to reproduce this bug reliably).
>>
>> Rewrite the loop that writes data into the
On 2018-03-06 14:01, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> This patch tweaks TestParallelOps in iotest 030 so it allocates data
> in smaller regions (256KB/512KB instead of 512KB/1MB) and the
> block-stream job in test_stream_commit() only needs to copy data that
> is at the very end of the image.
>
> This way
This patch tweaks TestParallelOps in iotest 030 so it allocates data
in smaller regions (256KB/512KB instead of 512KB/1MB) and the
block-stream job in test_stream_commit() only needs to copy data that
is at the very end of the image.
This way when the block-stream job is awakened it will finish
