* Dima Stepanov (dimas...@yandex-team.ru) wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:53:59AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Dima Stepanov (dimas...@yandex-team.ru) wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:50:39AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020/5/16 上午12:54, Dima Stepanov
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:54:57PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > >>> case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> > >>> /* a close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
> > >>>
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:56:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/13 下午12:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:30PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> On
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:53:59AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Dima Stepanov (dimas...@yandex-team.ru) wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:50:39AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020/5/16 上午12:54, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > > >On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason
* Dima Stepanov (dimas...@yandex-team.ru) wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:50:39AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/5/16 上午12:54, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >>On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > > case
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:50:39AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/16 上午12:54, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> > /* a close event may happen
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:52:08AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/16 上午11:20, Li Feng wrote:
> >Hi, Dima.
> >This abort is what I have mentioned in my previous email.
> >I have triggered this crash without any fix a week ago.
> >And I have written a test patch to let
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Li Feng wrote:
> Hi, Dima.
> This abort is what I have mentioned in my previous email.
Yes, i understood it and this abort() message was fixed by the previous
patch. But since we try new postphone approach this patch isn't working
and we need to get the
On 2020/5/16 上午11:20, Li Feng wrote:
Hi, Dima.
This abort is what I have mentioned in my previous email.
I have triggered this crash without any fix a week ago.
And I have written a test patch to let vhost_log_global_start return
int and propagate the error to up layer.
However, my change is a
On 2020/5/16 上午12:54, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
/* a close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
* code assumes the vhost_dev remains
Hi, Dima.
This abort is what I have mentioned in my previous email.
I have triggered this crash without any fix a week ago.
And I have written a test patch to let vhost_log_global_start return
int and propagate the error to up layer.
However, my change is a little large, because the origin
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >>> case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> >>> /* a close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
> >>> * code assumes the vhost_dev remains setup, so delay the
> >>>
On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
/* a close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
* code assumes the vhost_dev remains setup, so delay the
* stop & clear to idle.
* FIXME: better handle failure in vhost code,
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:56:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/13 下午12:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:30PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> On
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:20:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/12 下午5:35, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >>>On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On
On 2020/5/13 下午12:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:30PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/4/30
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:30PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > >On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >>On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > >>>If
On 2020/5/12 下午5:35, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:32:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >>>If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend for the vhost device, then we
>
and we can
continue migration. As a result no error is returned and assert() isn't
hit.
Also there is a question from Raphael to Michael about it you can find
it in this thread, by i will add it also:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in
> migration set log
Hi, Dima.
If vhost_migration_log return < 0, then vhost_log_global_start will
trigger a crash.
Does your patch have process this abort?
If a disconnect happens in the migration stage, the correct operation
is to stop the migration, right?
841 static void vhost_log_global_start(MemoryListener
On 2020/5/11 下午5:25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend for the vhost device, then we
should consider a possibility of disconnect at any moment. If such
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 08:03:39PM -0400, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:35 AM Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Apologies - I tripped over the if (dev->started && r < 0) check.
> Never-mind my point with race conditions and failing migrations.
>
>
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:15:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> >If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend for the vhost device, then we
> >should consider a possibility of disconnect at any moment. If such
> >disconnect happened in the
On 2020/4/30 下午9:36, Dima Stepanov wrote:
If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend for the vhost device, then we
should consider a possibility of disconnect at any moment. If such
disconnect happened in the vhost_migration_log() routine the vhost
device structure will be clean up.
At the
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:35 AM Dima Stepanov wrote:
>
> What do you think?
>
Apologies - I tripped over the if (dev->started && r < 0) check.
Never-mind my point with race conditions and failing migrations.
Rather than modifying vhost_dev_set_log(), it may be clearer to put a
check after
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> As you correctly point out, this code needs to be looked at more
> carefully so that
> if the device does disconnect in the background we can handle the migration
> path
> gracefully. In particular, we need to decide whether a
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> As you correctly point out, this code needs to be looked at more
> carefully so that
> if the device does disconnect in the background we can handle the migration
> path
> gracefully. In particular, we need to decide whether a
As you correctly point out, this code needs to be looked at more
carefully so that
if the device does disconnect in the background we can handle the migration path
gracefully. In particular, we need to decide whether a migration
should be allowed
to continue if a device disconnects durning the
29 matches
Mail list logo
