On 9/12/19 6:31 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I think locking the context during the "if (exp->blk) {" block at
>> nbd/server.c:1646 should do the trick.
That line number has moved over time; which function are you referring to?
>
> We need to be careful to avoid locking things twice, so
On 9/12/19 1:37 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>> I tried to test this patch, but even with it applied, I still got an
>> aio-context crasher by attempting an nbd-server-start, nbd-server-add,
>> nbd-server-stop (intentionally skipping the nbd-server-remove step) on a
>> domain using iothreads, with a
Am 12.09.2019 um 12:30 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
>
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 23:33 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 9/11/19 12:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> > On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> >> >> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 11.09.2019 um 23:33 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 9/11/19 12:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> > On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>> >> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
>> >> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client
Am 12.09.2019 um 12:13 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
>
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 18:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
> >> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
> >> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
> >> untouched.
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 11.09.2019 um 18:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
>> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
>> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
>> untouched.
>>
>> As a result, when using data-plane,
Am 11.09.2019 um 18:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
> untouched.
>
> As a result, when using data-plane, nbd_client_receive_next_request()
> schedules
Am 11.09.2019 um 23:33 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 9/11/19 12:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> >> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
> >> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
> >> untouched.
Eric Blake writes:
> On 9/11/19 12:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>>> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
>>> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
>>> untouched.
>>>
>>> As a result, when using
On 9/11/19 4:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I tried to test this patch, but even with it applied, I still got an
> aio-context crasher by attempting an nbd-server-start, nbd-server-add,
> nbd-server-stop (intentionally skipping the nbd-server-remove step) on a
> domain using iothreads, with a
On 9/11/19 12:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
>> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
>> untouched.
>>
>> As a result, when using data-plane,
On 9/11/19 11:15 AM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> On creation, the export's AioContext is set to the same one as the
> BlockBackend, while the AioContext in the client QIOChannel is left
> untouched.
>
> As a result, when using data-plane, nbd_client_receive_next_request()
> schedules coroutines in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
