On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:39:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Attached is a NON-working patch to nbdkit-partitioning-plugin which
> adds logical partition support. I don't think I've fully understood
> how the EBR fields are supposed to be initialized (or else they don't
> work how is
Attached is a NON-working patch to nbdkit-partitioning-plugin which
adds logical partition support. I don't think I've fully understood
how the EBR fields are supposed to be initialized (or else they don't
work how is described in online documentation). This actually causes
parted to print an
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:47:42PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> It matches the code, but I just learned the code is buggy for anything
> larger than 5. According to
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Large-Disk-HOWTO-13.html, MBR Extended/Logical
> partitions form a linked-list, something like:
>
> MBR:
On 1/18/19 7:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
> > Only expose MBR partition @var{num}. Understands physical partitions
> > 1-4 and logical partitions 5-8.
>
> I'm afraid, I'm too lazy to sort out these things I don't know, so just
> believe. It at least
> corresponds to limits
On 1/18/19 7:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>
>> Interesting, I don't get it again. Searched in outlook online, I found only
>> v2 of it,
>> checked spam folder and filters. Magic.
Weird indeed. Maybe there's enough @ signs due to .texi content in
there that a spam filter
18.01.2019 11:15, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 17.01.2019 22:36, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I got tired of debugging whether a server was advertising the
>> correct things during negotiation by inspecting the trace
>> logs of qemu-io as client - not to mention that without SOME
>> sort of
17.01.2019 22:36, Eric Blake wrote:
> I got tired of debugging whether a server was advertising the
> correct things during negotiation by inspecting the trace
> logs of qemu-io as client - not to mention that without SOME
> sort of client tracing particular commands, we can't easily
> regression
