On Thu 01 Feb 2018 07:22:16 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 16:43, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu 01 Feb 2018 04:23:09 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> However, I'm wondering whether this is the best approach. The old
> L2 table is probably not going to be used after this function,
On 2018-02-01 16:43, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 01 Feb 2018 04:23:09 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
However, I'm wondering whether this is the best approach. The old
L2 table is probably not going to be used after this function, so
we're basically polluting the cache here. That w
On Thu 01 Feb 2018 04:23:09 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:
>>> However, I'm wondering whether this is the best approach. The old
>>> L2 table is probably not going to be used after this function, so
>>> we're basically polluting the cache here. That was bad enough so
>>> far, but now that actually
On 1/2/2018 4:13 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Wed 31 Jan 2018 09:07:48 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2018-01-26 15:59, Alberto Garcia wrote:
This patch updates l2_allocate() to support the qcow2 cache returning
L2 slices instead of full L2 tables.
The old code simply gets an L2 table from the
