Hi.
The compilation of the latest qemu CVS version aborted due to a missing
texi2html package. In my opinion, the build shouldn't depend on
texi2html and pod2man. I suggest to make the documentation optional and
warn the user if any of the necessary tools are missing.
The attached patch modifies
Hi again.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:43 +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
The attached patch ...
... contained some stuff that should have been ignored by diff. Sorry,
revised patch attached to this mail.
Bye, Mike
diff -urN qemu-cvs/Makefile qemu-cvs-o42/Makefile
--- qemu-cvs/Makefile 2006-02-08
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:48:39AM +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi again.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:43 +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
The attached patch ...
... contained some stuff that should have been ignored by diff. Sorry,
revised patch attached to this mail.
diff -urN qemu-cvs/Makefile
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:54 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
What about just doing this
-install -m 644 qemu-doc.html qemu-tech.html $(docdir)
That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of
the documentation isn't generated.
Bye, Mike
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:59:55AM +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:54 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
What about just doing this
-install -m 644 qemu-doc.html qemu-tech.html $(docdir)
That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of
the
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:33 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of
the documentation isn't generated.
Not quite, you'll get
texi2html -monolithic etc failed
make: Error (ignored)
and the build will move on.
Uhm... yeah,
Hi.
The attached trivial patch for current CVS adds config-host-kqemu.mak to
the list of removed files in the distclean target.
Bye, Mike
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile (revision 4)
+++ Makefile (working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
The user still wont know the documentation has failed,
or he will have to search through the build logs.
--- Bernhard Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:59:55AM +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:54 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
What
On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown wrote:
This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
VMware...
It hangs my XP host with 100% cpu eaten up, no way to stop qemu,
or kqemu. I have to reboot, and my linux clients freezes very early
Src=CVS (yesterday 09/02/2006)
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:29:39PM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown wrote:
This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
VMware...
It hangs my XP host with 100% cpu eaten up, no way to stop qemu,
or kqemu. I have to reboot, and my linux
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:01 AM Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Hi,
I will update the documentation about -kernel-kqemu soon.
To be short: as some people already noticed, this option allows to run
user code and most of the kernel code on bare metal. The result is
usually a noticable speed
Thanks for your feedback. I've added additional check to dyngen.c, which
checks that function has either save; in the beginning and ret; restore;
in the end, or ends in retl; nop;. That allowed me to get past the arm
target build failure. Now it fails (during dyngen check) on ppc target,
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
