Hi. The attached patch allows qemu to dispatch usb data packets
asynchronously.
The uhci controller gives poor performance with this patch. It was
said on irc that allowing the uhci controller several pending requests
would improve this. However the ohci controller performs very well
as-is.
This makes linux detect new devices when they're attached with
"usb_add", if anyone cares.
OHCI manual (I checked in PXA27x manual to be exact) says a remote
wake-up should be sent when a device is attached and the host was
suspended. A more general fix (but only UHCI) was posted in
http://lists.
I needed the following change to build under FreeBSD 6.0.
---
Makefile|8 +---
Makefile.target |3 ++-
configure |7 +++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index f0a8199..568bd5b 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefil
The patch below moves the initialisation of the RTC date/time, currently
into hw/pc.c into hw/mc146818rtc.c as this part of the initialization
is not guest specific. This avoid duplication of code in (future)
platforms emulation.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :'
Even Rouault wrote:
Le Jeudi 16 Novembre 2006 23:41, vous avez écrit :
My main remark is that the host/guest communication system must be
changed and I can help you to implement it. I would prefer to use a PCI
device and to avoid any i386 dependent code. For the PCI device, using
the Bochs VGA
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Are the writes to tmpfs (in a *nix guest OS) recorded to the
> snapshotted image?
>
> Example: /var/run on tmpfs
> OS writes to /var/run. Bigger temp file or not?
This isn't a guaranteed certain answer, but IIRC tmpfs uses system RAM and
swap as its
Are the writes to tmpfs (in a *nix guest OS) recorded to the
snapshotted image?
Example: /var/run on tmpfs
OS writes to /var/run. Bigger temp file or not?
Thank you
Ottavio
Sponsored Link
Compare mortgage r
Le Jeudi 16 Novembre 2006 23:41, vous avez écrit :
> My main remark is that the host/guest communication system must be
> changed and I can help you to implement it. I would prefer to use a PCI
> device and to avoid any i386 dependent code. For the PCI device, using
> the Bochs VGA adapter could be
