NB: Addition of these builtins was prompted by qemu failing to build on
armel in Ubuntu; this is because we default to Thumb 2 mode which
doesn't have the assembly instructions in question.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Lo?c Minier wrote:
NB: Addition of these builtins was prompted by qemu failing to build on
armel in Ubuntu; this is because we default to Thumb 2 mode which
doesn't have the assembly instructions in question.
when exiting qemu that run with -monitor /dev/tty, the launching
terminal get weird behaviour because no restore terminals action has
taken.
added chr_close and register atexit() code for tty devices (like stdio
does)
Signed-off-by: Shahar Havivi shah...@redhat.com
---
qemu-char.c | 14
On 2/19/10, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Linux/x86, configuring with --enable-debug, I get:
CCsparc64-linux-user/translate.o
/home/foad/git/qemu/target-sparc/translate.c: In function
‘gen_load_trap_state_at_tl’:
/home/foad/git/qemu/target-sparc/translate.c:1684: error:
On 2/19/10, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
After configuring with --enable-debug on Linux/x86, I get:
f...@foad-ubuntu:~/qemu/objdir-git$ qemu-alpha /dev/null
qemu-alpha: /home/foad/git/qemu/tcg/tcg.c:1055:
tcg_add_target_add_op_defs: Assertion `tcg_op_defs[op].used' failed.
Aborted
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010, malc wrote:
For instance this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-06/msg00112.html
The builtins are too coarse grained and will do more stuff than strictly
necessary.
Is this the case of the builtins I'm proposing to use? We could ask
for new ones without
Thanks, applied all.
On 2/19/10, Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net wrote:
Changes since v1:
* Add comments for all optional instructions that aren't implemented
on each architecture, as requested.
* Rebase vs master.
r~
Richard Henderson (7):
tcg-sparc: Implement neg.
Yes, except for the Signed-off-by: line.
Do I need to resend it for that? And if so, does that make it PATCH v2
(even though the patch hasn't changed)?
Or can I just put the fixed Signed-off-by: line in a reply?
Thanks,
Jay.
On 2/20/10, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, except for the Signed-off-by: line.
Do I need to resend it for that? And if so, does that make it PATCH v2
(even though the patch hasn't changed)?
Or can I just put the fixed Signed-off-by: line in a reply?
I'd suppose you'd also want
On 32-bit hosts op_qemu_ld32s is unused. Remove it to fix the
following assertion failure:
qemu-alpha: tcg/tcg.c:1055:
tcg_add_target_add_op_defs: Assertion `tcg_op_defs[op].used' failed.
Signed-off-by: Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com
---
tcg/tcg-opc.h |5 -
1 files changed, 0
Thanks, applied.
On 2/20/10, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On 32-bit hosts op_qemu_ld32s is unused. Remove it to fix the
following assertion failure:
qemu-alpha: tcg/tcg.c:1055:
tcg_add_target_add_op_defs: Assertion `tcg_op_defs[op].used' failed.
Signed-off-by: Jay Foad
Use 32-bit arithmetic for the address offset calculation to fix a
build failure on 32-bit hosts.
Signed-off-by: Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com
---
target-sparc/translate.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-sparc/translate.c
Thanks, applied.
On 2/20/10, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Use 32-bit arithmetic for the address offset calculation to fix a
build failure on 32-bit hosts.
Signed-off-by: Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com
---
target-sparc/translate.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11
On 02/20/2010 01:30 AM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
when exiting qemu that run with -monitor /dev/tty, the launching
terminal get weird behaviour because no restore terminals action has
taken.
added chr_close and register atexit() code for tty devices (like stdio
does)
Signed-off-by: Shahar
Add a QEMU timer only when needed (timeout status not set, timeout
irq wanted and timer set).
This patch is required for Darwin. Patch has been tested under
FreeBSD, Darwin and Linux.
---
hw/rtl8139.c | 139 +++---
1 files changed, 84
2010/2/20 Igor Kovalenko igor.v.kovale...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
On 02/19/2010 04:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.02.2010, at 22:50, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2010 02:35 AM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
Add a QEMU
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:18:54AM -0700, David S. Ahern wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:18:54 -0700
From: David S. Ahern daah...@cisco.com
To: Shahar Havivi shah...@redhat.com
CC: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dor Laor dl...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] terminal attributes is not
On 02/19/2010 07:49 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/15/2010 10:19 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
The current implementation of alloc_refcount_block and grow_refcount_table has
fundamental problems regarding error handling. There are some places
On 02/20/2010 09:18 AM, David S. Ahern wrote:
On 02/20/2010 01:30 AM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
when exiting qemu that run with -monitor /dev/tty, the launching
terminal get weird behaviour because no restore terminals action has
taken.
added chr_close and register atexit() code for tty devices
On 02/20/2010 10:06 AM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
Add a QEMU timer only when needed (timeout status not set, timeout
irq wanted and timer set).
This patch is required for Darwin. Patch has been tested under
FreeBSD, Darwin and Linux.
This is missing a Signed-off-by.
Regards,
Anthony
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that qemu is capable of decently running _something_ on
sparc, so the problems I'm seeing are more likely to be uClibc or
toolchain issues.
qemu-sparc can decently run
Add a QEMU timer only when needed (timeout status not set, timeout
irq wanted and timer set).
This patch is required for Darwin. Patch has been tested under
FreeBSD, Darwin and Linux.
---
hw/rtl8139.c | 139 +++---
1 files changed, 84
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that qemu is capable of decently running _something_ on
sparc, so the problems I'm seeing are more likely to be uClibc
Add a QEMU timer only when needed (timeout status not set, timeout
irq wanted and timer set).
This patch is required for Darwin. Patch has been tested under
FreeBSD, Darwin and Linux.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio fredd...@gmail.com
---
hw/rtl8139.c | 139
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Lo?c Minier wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010, malc wrote:
For instance this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-06/msg00112.html
The builtins are too coarse grained and will do more stuff than strictly
necessary.
Is this the case of the builtins I'm
When we signal a CpU exception for coprocessor 0, we should indicate
that it's for coprocessor 0 instead of coprocessor 1.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com
---
target-mips/translate.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com
---
target-mips/translate.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-mips/translate.c b/target-mips/translate.c
index dfea6f6..de5ac18 100644
--- a/target-mips/translate.c
+++ b/target-mips/translate.c
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
using software emulated floating point at the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:03:41AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:03:41 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws
To: David S. Ahern daah...@cisco.com
Cc: Dor Laor dl...@redhat.com, Shahar Havivi shah...@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
---
hppa-dis.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hppa-dis.c b/hppa-dis.c
index 9d96d72..49f99c8 100644
--- a/hppa-dis.c
+++ b/hppa-dis.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ struct pa_opcode
const char *name;
unsigned long int match; /* Bits that must be
---
tcg/tcg.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
index e6a1caf..32345cc 100644
--- a/tcg/tcg.c
+++ b/tcg/tcg.c
@@ -596,7 +596,17 @@ void tcg_gen_callN(TCGContext *s, TCGv_ptr func, unsigned
int flags,
Tested on debian/parisc (pa8600, 32-bit), and is good enough to run
the linux-user-test-0.3 binaries for arm, armeb, i386, mips, mipsel,
sh4, and sh4eb. It still fails for ppc and sparc userland; that'll
take more debugging.
I had a go at sparc-test-0.2, since that's the only one that reliably
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:47:52AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
Tested on debian/parisc (pa8600, 32-bit), and is good enough to run
the linux-user-test-0.3 binaries for arm, armeb, i386, mips, mipsel,
sh4, and sh4eb. It still fails for ppc and sparc userland; that'll
take more debugging.
2010/2/20 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that qemu is capable of decently running _something_
on
sparc, so the
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Stuart Brady wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:47:52AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
Tested on debian/parisc (pa8600, 32-bit), and is good enough to run
the linux-user-test-0.3 binaries for arm, armeb, i386, mips, mipsel,
sh4, and sh4eb. It still fails for ppc and
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is
2010/2/20 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
using
On 2/20/10, Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/2/20 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:54:46AM +0300, malc wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Stuart Brady wrote:
The qemu_ld / qemu_st cleanup strikes me as something that would be
appropriate for some other TCG targets too, once this has been applied.
Care to point out what this cleanup is, my HPPA-fu is
On 02/20/2010 01:54 PM, malc wrote:
The qemu_ld / qemu_st cleanup strikes me as something that would be
appropriate for some other TCG targets too, once this has been applied.
Care to point out what this cleanup is, my HPPA-fu is around zero.
Split out a tlb_read function from
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/20/2010 01:54 PM, malc wrote:
The qemu_ld / qemu_st cleanup strikes me as something that would be
appropriate for some other TCG targets too, once this has been applied.
Care to point out what this cleanup is, my HPPA-fu is around
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Stuart Brady wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:54:46AM +0300, malc wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Stuart Brady wrote:
The qemu_ld / qemu_st cleanup strikes me as something that would be
appropriate for some other TCG targets too, once this has been applied.
Care
On 02/20/2010 02:22 PM, malc wrote:
Ah, so i already half did it, good to know.
I stole several good ideas from the ppc64 port. ;-)
That one and using indexed loads to handle GUEST_BASE.
r~
On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:59:31 Blue Swirl wrote:
I've got 2.6.32 booting to a command prompt (albeit with serial console
and intentionall restricted set of hardware). But then it misbehaves.
I'll try getting 2.6.18 to build with a known .config, and then bisect
forward if that
When booting a Juniper JunOS kernel (FreeBSD based) I am getting a
panic: unkown/reserved trap error immediately after the kernel loads.
If i use an older pc-bios with the '-bios' option everything works so
it seems to be an issue with the SeaBios.
With #DEBUG_BIOS enabled in hw/pc.c here is what
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 05:23:59PM -0700, Brandon Bennett wrote:
When booting a Juniper JunOS kernel (FreeBSD based) I am getting a
panic: unkown/reserved trap error immediately after the kernel loads.
If i use an older pc-bios with the '-bios' option everything works so
it seems to be an
46 matches
Mail list logo
