On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:21:14PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:13:22PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at
On 05/29/2010 11:01 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Jan Kiszkajan.kis...@web.de writes:
From: Jan Kiszkajan.kis...@siemens.com
As the user may specify ambiguous device IDs, let's search for their
official names first before considering the user-supplied identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Jan
On 05/12/2010 09:11 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Avi Kivity wrote:
It's useful if you have a one-line horizontal pattern you want to
propagate all over.
It might be useful
On 05/29/2010 11:14 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Currently breaks down when IDs contain '/', but permitting that is a
bug. There may be more problems; the path lookup code is way too
clever.
Indeed. Less can sometimes be more. My impression is that some of the
cleverness was motivated by
On 05/28/2010 09:21 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
snip, agreed
Summary of the host / guest split:
-drive options host or guest?
bus, unit, if, index, addr guest, already covered by qdev
cyls, heads, secs, transguest, new qdev properties
On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
set the password and try again.
It's what we do today, a password should be set with block_passwd before
issuing the change command. Otherwise an error is throw.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/5/29 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
Robert Reif did some improvements to SuperSparc emulation, but the
work was not finished. That should be a good starting point.
Do you mean the last patch he sent to us
2010/5/30 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 08:52:34PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:03:22PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/5/29 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sat, May 29, 2010
On 05/28/2010 01:19 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Still, this does not answer:
- How do you want to detect lost timer ticks?
Your (and Gleb's) approach: during injection
An alternative: during guest ack
The normal pattern is inj/ack/inj/ack; if we see inj/inj/inj we know the
guest isn't
On 05/29/2010 12:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
This would allow counting the executed instructions and limit it. Thus
we could emulate a 500MHz CPU on a 2GHz CPU more accurately.
Why would you want to limit number of instruction executed by guest if
CPU has nothing else to do anyway? The
2010/5/30 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:21:14PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:13:22PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Blue Swirl wrote:
Linux don't use RTC as time source and I don't know about BSD, so no
Linux or BSD test case for you, sorry. Run WindowXP standard HAL and put
heavy load on the host. You can run video inside the gust to trigger
coalescing more easily.
I don't have Windows XP, sorry.
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:10:16PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
You missed the key word 'stopped'. If the timer is really stopped, no
IRQs should ever come out afterwards, just like on real HW. For the
emulation, this means loss of ticks which should have been delivered
before the change.
2010/5/30 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:10:16PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
You missed the key word 'stopped'. If the timer is really stopped, no
IRQs should ever come out afterwards, just like on real HW. For the
emulation, this means loss of ticks which should
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
Linux don't use RTC as time source and I don't know about BSD, so no
Linux or BSD test case for you, sorry. Run WindowXP standard HAL and put
heavy load on the host. You can run video inside the gust to
2010/5/30 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:10:16PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
You missed the key word 'stopped'. If the timer is really stopped, no
IRQs should ever come out afterwards, just like on real HW. For the
emulation, this means loss of ticks which should
QtEmu 1.0.5 in Linux KDuXPv1.97 , workfine.
qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org escreveu:
Send Qemu-devel mailing list submissions to
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
or, via email,
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:56:26PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Well, I'd like to get the test program also trigger it. Now I'm getting:
apic: write: 0350 =
apic: apic_reset_irq_delivered: old coalescing 0
apic: apic_local_deliver: vector 3 delivery mode 0
apic: apic_set_irq:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:30:46PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
add helper function which converts root bus to pci domain.
make them aware of pci domain.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata yamah...@valinux.co.jp
Doesn't seem to apply to master.
---
Changes: V1 - V2
- removed pci_find_bus()
-
Create a link.
SYNOPSIS
size[4] Tlink tag[2] dfid[4] oldpath[s] newpath[s]
size[4] Rlink tag[2]
DESCRIPTION
Create a link 'newpath' in directory pointed by dfid linking to oldpath.
Signed-off-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri jv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
hw/file-op-9p.h |2 +-
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:56:26PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Well, I'd like to get the test program also trigger it. Now I'm getting:
apic: write: 0350 =
apic: apic_reset_irq_delivered: old coalescing 0
apic:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
The following changes since commit 259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa031660de8:
lsi: Fix value overflow in request tag processing (2010-05-22 15:32:32 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
The following changes since commit 259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa031660de8:
lsi: Fix value overflow in request tag processing (2010-05-22 15:32:32
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
The following changes since commit
259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa031660de8:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:19:40PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:19:40PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
The following
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:56:26PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Well, I'd like to get the test program also trigger it. Now I'm getting:
apic: write: 0350 =
apic: apic_reset_irq_delivered: old coalescing 0
apic:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 07:37:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:56:26PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Well, I'd like to get the test program also trigger it. Now I'm getting:
apic: write: 0350 =
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 07:37:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:56:26PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Well, I'd like to get the test
lower interrupt during chip reset. Otherwise the ESP_RSTAT register
may get out of sync with the IRQ line status. This effect became
visible after commit 65899fe3
Signed-off-by: Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@gmail.com
---
hw/esp.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
Greetings Gerd, Kevin and Co,
Attached are two patches to add the necesary CDB parsing to determine
SCSIRequest-cmd.xfer
(length) and SCSIRequest-cmd.mode (direction) for Persistent Reservation IN/OUT
CDBs and for Maintenance IN/OUT CDBs used for
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and
PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN
case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into
SCSIRequest-cmd.xfer,
and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode()
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add MAINTENANCE_IN and MAINTENANCE_OUT case
in
scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into
SCSIRequest-cmd.xfer,
and adds a second MAINTENANCE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to
properly
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:48:03PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:30:46PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
add helper function which converts root bus to pci domain.
make them aware of pci domain.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata yamah...@valinux.co.jp
Doesn't
I’m working with Qemu source study, but now I have some difficulty in these
assembly instructions at the beginning of cpu_exec function. My question as
follows:
After entering function cpu_exec, there are some assembly codes:
register host_reg_t reg_AREG0 asm(ebp);
volatile host_reg_t
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:21:30PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 07:37:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at
37 matches
Mail list logo
