ive, thus
> it is no longer necessary to check the vmp0 bit in the LPCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsi...@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
sjitindarsi...@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
+/* Architecture 3.00 variant */
> +POWERPC_MMU_3_00 = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG
> + | POWERPC_MMU_64K
> + | POWERPC_MMU_AMR | 0x00000005,
I wonder if we need a POWERPC_MMU_RADIX that we can then attach
with future versions
Balbir Singh.
As per the ISA we need a cause and executing a tabort r9 in libc
for example causes a EXCP_FU exception, we don't wire up the
IC (cause) when we post the exception. The cause is required
for the kernel to do the right thing. The fix applies only to 64
bit ppc targets.
Signed-off-by: Balbir
On 10/11/16 13:46, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:06:17PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:42:37PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> As per the ISA we need a cause for FU exceptions.Executing a tabort r9
>&
against Cedrics' latest pnv ipmi branch.
Signed-off-by: Balbir singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
---
target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
index 808760b..cccea8d 100644
--- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
+++ b/
uest's device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobr...@au1.ibm.com>
> ---
>
Make sense
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
n the
> guest's device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobr...@au1.ibm.com>
> ---
Makes sense
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsinghar...@gmail.com>
>
* Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com [2010-11-03 09:35:33]:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Balbir Singh wrote:
A lot of the code is borrowed from zone_reclaim_mode logic for
__zone_reclaim(). One might argue that the with ballooning and
KSM this feature is not very useful, but even with ballooning
This is version 3 of the page cache control patches
From: Balbir Singh bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This series has three patches, the first controls
the amount of unmapped page cache usage via a boot
parameter and sysctl. The second patch controls page
and slab cache via the balloon driver. Both
Provide memory hint during ballooning
From: Balbir Singh bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This patch adds an optional hint to the qemu monitor balloon
command. The hint tells the guest operating system to consider
a class of memory during reclaim. Currently the supported
hint is cached memory
Balloon unmapped page cache pages first
From: Balbir Singh bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This patch builds on the ballooning infrastructure by ballooning unmapped
page cache pages first. It looks for low hanging fruit first and tries
to reclaim clean unmapped pages first.
This patch brings
gautham.she...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi sripat...@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Acked-by: Balbir Singh bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
* Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) jv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-10-19 20:46:35]:
I think this is a lot more fragile. You're relying on the fact that
signal will not cause the signalled thread to actually awaken until
we release the lock and doing work after signalling that the
signalled
* Arun R B a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-10-19 23:12:45]:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This patch creates a generic asynchronous-task-offloading infrastructure named
threadlets. The core idea has been borrowed from the threading framework that
is being used by
* Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com [2010-10-19 21:01:03]:
On 10/19/2010 08:36 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
Ideally you need
s = pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, NULL);
But qemu will need to wrap this around as well.
Why? QEMU is never using thread cancellation
* Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws [2010-10-19 16:36:31]:
On 10/19/2010 01:36 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
+qemu_mutex_lock((queue-lock));
+while (1) {
+ThreadletWork *work;
+int ret = 0;
+
+while (QTAILQ_EMPTY((queue-request_list))
+ (ret
.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy e...@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi sripat...@in.ibm.com
This change seems reasonable to me
Acked-by: Balbir Singh bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
* Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) jv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2010-10-19 14:00:24]:
In the case that we just spawned the threadlet, the cond_signal is
spurious. If we need predictable scheduling behaviour,
qemu_cond_signal needs to happen with queue-lock held.
I'd rewrite the function as
19 matches
Mail list logo
