On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:14:11PM +0530, Jay Khandkar wrote:
> When the local APIC is in a software disabled state, all local interrupt
> sources must be masked and all attempts to unmask them should be
> ignored. Currently, we don't do either. Fix this by handling it
&g
Have sent in v2.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 4:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:04:47PM +0530, Jay Khandkar wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 19:38, Jay Khandkar
> wrote:
> >
When the local APIC is in a software disabled state, all local interrupt
sources must be masked and all attempts to unmask them should be
ignored. Currently, we don't do either. Fix this by handling it
correctly in apic_mem_write().
Signed-off-by: Jay Khandkar
---
hw/intc/apic.c | 8
1
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 19:38, Jay Khandkar wrote:
> >
> > When the local APIC is in a software disabled state, all local interrupt
> > sources must be masked and all attempts to unmask them should be
> > i
Ping?
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022, 19:49 Jay Khandkar, wrote:
> When the local APIC is in a software disabled state, all local interrupt
> sources must be masked and all attempts to unmask them should be
> ignored. Currently, we don't do either. Fix this by handling it
> correctly in ap
When the local APIC is in a software disabled state, all local interrupt
sources must be masked and all attempts to unmask them should be
ignored. Currently, we don't do either. Fix this by handling it
correctly in apic_mem_write().
Signed-off-by: Jay Khandkar
---
hw/intc/apic.c | 16
