On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 13:04 +0800, James Lau wrote:
hi everybody,
For some security issues, I want to detect whether my Windows program
is running inside qemu. Have any ideas?
Security issues? That's a bit vague.
More information about what you're attempting to do would be helpful.
There
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 03:03 -0400, Armistead, Jason wrote:
Hi
With SIMH, the VAX / PDP / nostalgic mini/mainframe emulator
(http://simh.trailing-edge.com/) the console port on the emulated system is
directed to a TCP/IP port, so that you can simply Telnet into it. Once the
connection is
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 16:03 -0800, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
It looks like qemu (at least version 0.7.2, which is what I'm running
here) doesn't set SO_REUSEADDR before calling bind(), which makes that
fairly useless. This obvious patch moves up setting SO_REUSEADDR to the
right place,
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 22:45 +, Richard Neill wrote:
qemu -cdrom /dev/cdrom -boot d -user-net -redir tcp:2300::2301
In Guest (knoppix):
netcat -l -p 2301
On Host:
netcat localhost 2300
This connection is accepted (Netcat doesn't say connection refused),
but then no
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 01:44 +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
The use of gcc to generate the back end in QEMU's early days was a
clever way to get the project up and running quickly. But surely
now it would be better to transition to a handwritten backend, so
It should be trivial to take
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:29 -0500, Glenn Gagné wrote:
I installed Qemu 0.7.2 on Windows 2000 Pro and I run a Windows 95 in the
virtual environement of Qemu. I have an old
MS-DOS application to use who communicate on serial port... But it's not
working in the virtual environement.
Qemu is
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 12:48 +0200, Stefano Marinelli wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:29:45 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
Barely on-topic, but since VmWare interop crops up from time to time:
http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
I don't like it. It's just a player and the images can't
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 18:09 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
So, any ideas here on how to easily use Qemu and Synergy? IMHO, Qemu
would greatly benefit from these features. But I don't see a way to
integrate the two programs. Do you?
Very cool. Have you talked to the developers of this
Barely on-topic, but since VmWare interop crops up from time to time:
http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
I doubt this is targeted at QEMU, but rather at competing with Microsoft
and VirtualPC. That or they are leaving the low-end market for server
consolidation.
This may in fact be as much
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:22 -0700, Mike Swanson wrote:
Yeah, it barely on topic. But the .vmx files are extremely simple text
files, and qemu-img creates vmdk disk images.
That was my first thought when I saw this as well.
Yes, it's possible to
install operating systems solely withing
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:34 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
After re-installing windows 2000 SP3 SP4 about 25 times on different
machines, its looking wierd..
SP4 has a problem when configuring COM+ with no kqemu, but works fine with
kqemu on all 3 machines
(PIII, Sempron 2400+ Athlon XP
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:02 -0400, John Coiner wrote:
It was a tiny bug...
Windows does not like QEMU's DHCP server. Windows always issues
DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST packets in pairs: first the DHCPDISCOVER,
followed by a DHCPREQUEST. The DHCPREQUEST is a sanity check. Windows
wants
I don't know a lot about Slirp details other than what I generally know
about proxy server and NAT router implementation (I know a lot about
that). But perhaps I can raise some questions for you.
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 22:34 -0400, John Coiner wrote:
The alternative would have been to debug the
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 11:25 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:38 +, Juan Martín Carril wrote:
Hi
How i can use Qemu with Dosemu ??
You would install DosEmu into QEMU into Linux or Windows.
But don't do that, since it makes no sense:
err, sorry I meant
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 15:00 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
in qemu monitor (press CTRL ALT 2 to reach to the monitor): type:
sendkey ctrl-alt-del and press Enter
then press CTRL ALT 1 - and viola, you can type your login and password.
Hetz
Implies a nice feature would be to allow CTRL-ALT
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:40 +0200, Stefan Kombrink wrote:
Hi there,
I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
pay
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:59 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
Um, KQEMU/qvm86 don't do dynamic translation. They are virtualizers. They run
the code given to them (more or less) unchanged.
Sorry, I was speaking more generally (and imprecisely) about the
qemu/kqemu as a combination. As you state
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:17 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
You might want to look at my hand-coded backed for qemu. The intention is
that
this will eventually replace dyngen/gcc altogether. Currently everything
except the experimental m68k target uses a mixture of the old and the
micro-ops.
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 11:05 -0700, Francois Rioux wrote:
I notice that QEMU is quite slower than VMWare.
It certainly is.
Apparently due to the way IO occur. What are the strategies to
enhance that performance?
Curious, why do you think that? There are probably a whole host of
reasons
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 19:23 -0700, Francois Rioux wrote:
I don't understand why this doesn't work. Is it Windows preventing the
write is the exchange this a limitation in QEMU or in SLiRP? As I
understand it SLiRP translates some tcp headers and acts as a firewall
preventing incoming calls
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 22:27 -0500, Matt Lawrence wrote:
I've given up on trying to build a disk image manually, so now I'm
trying to automate the kickstart installation for CentOS4. By using an
iso of the first CD and a floppy file with a ks.cfg and doing a linux
ks=floppy at the boot screen,
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 16:38 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
I could use -serial stdio
but how do I get it connected to the usb port? I'm guessing netcat/socat
but I've never used that utility.
Anyone have a recipe that works?
I ended up figuring out a way to do this... using socat
VmWare seems to let you do it any way you want. Full screen, scroll it
manually or auto scroll, etc. So clearly it can be done. Maybe the code
in something like VNC client would give some ideas.
Scaling an image *down* to fit in window of a given size seems totally
pointless other than to give a
I was fiddling with getting FTP to work across user-net, and it seems to
me that there are some NAT issues with FTP, and DNS.
These specific issues can be fixed in slirp tcp_subr.c and elsewhere for
udp based DNS, but I'm wondering if this is the right way to go about
it. Perhaps the netfilter
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 23:26 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
You can't due to licensing issues. netfilter is licensed under the GPL.
Well of course anyone one could do it.
Based on keeping system emulation under the BSD license it can't...
basically a non-reason on actual technical merit. So if
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:19 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
It's a cool idea, I think. I went through the mingw thing a while back
and it's a PITA. It would be nice to have known working build
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R. Hogerhuis
BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 22:30 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:28 -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Why would anyone want run an emulator in another emulator..
-ishwar
Well at least it's hard to argue with the fact that it's an excellent
'pathological case' to test QEMU.
-- John.
___
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
Did you try passive mode?
nice suggestion.
passive mode off: dir lasts forever...
passive mode on: dir give connection refused.
any idea?
Christian
Suggest some packet sniffs to see who is getting stuck.
-- John.
I can think of some reasons for a non-native file service that is
instead built into QEMU:
a) One interface to all clients outside of QEMU. Lowers the learning
curve for dealing with different enviroments; at least for some raw file
access they are all accessible in the same way. You can lower
31 matches
Mail list logo
