>From time to time I'm using Qemu on my Solaris 11/amd64 workstation.
But as in case of AIX, Solaris build was neither done easily in IIRC I
also tweaked configure in a place or two. So if you keep it, good, if
not, no end of world as I'm planning to migrate to some other OS
anyway in the future
I use -net nic,model=i82551 -net user for OpenBSD, perhaps this will
also work for you? This is for Qemu 2.2.0 and whole command line
looks: /opt/qemu-2.2.0/bin/qemu-system-sparc64 -hda
openbsd_sparc64.img -m 1024 -nographic -net nic,model=i82551 -net
user
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Dennis
to this testing in foreseeable future again.
Thanks! Karel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 03.08.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Karel Gardas:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
ok - NetBSD 6.5.1 SPARC64 is blasting fast
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
ok - NetBSD 6.5.1 SPARC64 is blasting fast compare to Debian 7.8.0 SPARC64 -
i installed the complete system (without X) in a few minutes
Debian needs 1h
I had the same experience with OpenBSD for sparc64, also fast to
Gardas gard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 29.07.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Karel Gardas:
What was interesting was that nbench2 was comparable on aarch64
was aarch64 a little or big-endian system, with unaligned accesses possible
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
(i've posted the question already on qemu-disc...@nongnu.org but was toled
to better use this mailing list)
i've prepared an Debian 7.8.0 image for SPARC64/qemu emulation for C/C++
development before-real-hardware
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 29.07.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Karel Gardas:
What was interesting was that nbench2 was comparable on aarch64
was aarch64 a little or big-endian system, with unaligned accesses possible?
This was Ubuntu with Linux
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 29.07.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Karel Gardas:
If
anybody is interested I can dig those old emails.
would be nice
Here is speed comparison:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/02/msg1.html but whole
thread
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ ./a.out
endianess: little
try to access unaligned word
equal to 0x1234: YES
value: 0x1234
done
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Dennis Luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 29.07.2015 um 14:34 schrieb Karel Gardas:
Once it boots, tell me how to find the asnwers to your
/developers community gained from your work on Qemu. If you have not
provided anything, then please just think about it next time you're going
to attack somebody who provided a lot.
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http
, this indicates that
it is a multicast-address. Strange things will happen if you use
a multicast address where you should use a unicast address.
Please redo your tests with MAC-addresses 52:54:00:11:22:33 and
52:54:00:12:34:56
Greetings,
Mark.
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED
lost 100% of packets.
Qemu is compiled with GCC 3.4 on Debian Sarge on AMD64 (64bit).
Any idea what to do to better debug this issue?
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
at www.skyeye.org project to see how other projects do
emulation for actual embedded devices.
Cheers,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu
this mailing list, so I would
assume this to be common practice.
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http
RTEMS/PowerPC apps (which are also standard multi-boot elfs)
Unfortunately, I've not been able to come with any patch for this yet...
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
...
BTW: I'm using -M prep
Thanks!
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Hello,
I'm curious if ``Open source Slimline Open Firmware (SLOF)'' as made
available by IBM on
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-dw-slof.html
is of any use for Qemu/PPC system emulation.
Cheers,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity
...'' and
that's all, nothing more and just consume 100% CPU.
Thanks,
Karel
El 15/07/2005, a las 21:17, Karel Gardas escribió:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Brian Wheeler wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:52 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Brian Wheeler wrote:
All of the websites
Hello,
short followup: exactly the same issue also hits qemu 0.7.0 release.
Cheers,
Karel
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
Qemu's trunk sources obtained from today CVS fails to compile on debian
3.1/amd64 platform. The error is:
gcc -g -Wl,-T,/home/karel/cvs/qemu/qemu
19 matches
Mail list logo
