All noted, and thanks for all the bits you reviewed so far, I'll do the
changes and resubmit.
M
On 6 January 2014 15:52, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com wrote:
Implements the pinctrl and GPIO block for the imx23
It
On 6 January 2014 15:46, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com wrote:
This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow
linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23.
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet
Can someone give me a pointer on how the review (if any) is done for these
patches? I have to say I'm rather amazed at the rate of submission on the
mailing list, and I worried to see these patches buried further and further
down in such a short timescale :-)
Michael
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at
peter.mayd...@linaro.orgwrote:
On 13 December 2013 12:53, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone give me a pointer on how the review (if any) is done for
these
patches? I have to say I'm rather amazed at the rate of submission on the
mailing list, and I worried to see these patches buried further
Support for a dallas/maxim onewire sensor, enough of it to
fool linux's w1-gpio driver
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com
---
hw/misc/Makefile.objs | 2 +
hw/misc/w1-ds18s20.c | 332
++
2 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
create
I've just posted the imx233 patch series, with a board that uses this
driver.
M
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.orgwrote:
On 11 December 2013 12:22, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
Support for a dallas/maxim onewire sensor, enough of it to
fool
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.orgwrote:
On 11 December 2012 15:08, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
Showing 11 changed files with 2,236 additions and 0 deletions
In the i.MX23 emulation, there is a EHCI sysbus device which is supported
and seems to work well already (using -usbdevice host:...)
However most of the other peripherals (serial, hub, net) fail do to a
'speed mismatch' error. I looked into a bit more details, and it seems the
EHCI has to be
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/13/12 11:38, M P wrote:
In the i.MX23 emulation, there is a EHCI sysbus device which is supported
and seems to work well already (using -usbdevice host:...)
However most of the other peripherals (serial, hub
I've added imx23 support to qemu, with quite a lot of working peripherals,
and enough to boot linux with SD card and USB working. There are bits
missing (audio, video outputs) but it's otherwise working pretty well.
I've collated and cleaned the patches onto this github branch, I'd
appreciate any
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.orgwrote:
On 11 December 2012 13:08, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
I've added imx23 support to qemu, with quite a lot of working
peripherals,
and enough to boot linux with SD card and USB working. There are bits
missing
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Julien Heyman bidsom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dave.
I use system emulation, and my main concern is just to know that the
actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example,
and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Färber andreas.faer...@web.de wrote:
Since Christmas and the New Year with its good intensions are approaching,
apart from z80 there's some more feature forks around:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/forks?o=age
- hpoussin.git ppc contains the 40p machine
13 matches
Mail list logo
