On 7/25/23 13:39, Fan Ni wrote:
> From: Fan Ni
>
> Add (file/memory backed) host backend, all the dynamic capacity regions
> will share a single, large enough host backend. Set up address space for
> DC regions to support read/write operations to dynamic capacity for DCD.
>
> With the change,
&& dpa + len <= ent->start_dpa + ent->len) {
> +ret = CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PA;
> +goto out;
> +} else if ((dpa < ent->start_dpa + ent->len
> +&& dpa + len > ent->start_dpa + ent->len
error_setg(errp, "dynamic capacity must have backing device");
> +return false;
> + }
> +/* FIXME: set dc as nonvolatile for now */
> +memory_region_set_nonvolatile(dc_mr, true);
> +memory_region_set_enabled(dc_mr, tru
On 5/11/23 12:56, Fan Ni wrote:
> From: Fan Ni
>
> Add dynamic capacity extent information to the definition of
> CXLType3Dev and add get DC extent list mailbox command based on
> CXL.spec.3.0:.8.2.9.8.9.2.
>
> With this command, we can create dc regions as below:
>
> region=$(cat
On 5/11/23 12:56, Fan Ni wrote:
> From: Fan Ni
>
> Per cxl spec 3.0, add dynamic capacity region representative based on
> Table 8-126 and extend the cxl type3 device definition to include dc region
> information. Also, based on info in 8.2.9.8.9.1, add 'Get Dynamic Capacity
> Configuration'
are not considered
> by the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Fontenot <nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
>
> - Included address information for all LMBs in ibm,dynamic-memory.
> - Use both
On 06/06/2016 09:47 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:14:48AM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 06:37 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>> Memory hotplug can fail for some combinations of RAM and maxmem when
>>> DDW is enabled in the presence o
On 06/06/2016 06:37 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Memory hotplug can fail for some combinations of RAM and maxmem when
> DDW is enabled in the presence of devices like nec-usb-xhci. DDW depends
> on maximum addressable memory returned by guest and this value is currently
> being calculated wrongly by
On 03/22/2016 10:22 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:11:54AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:36:05PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:08:56AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
Add support to hot remove pc-dimm memory devices.
On 10/26/2015 04:53 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Add support to hot remove pc-dimm memory devices.
>
> TODO: In response to memory hot removal operation on a DIMM device,
> guest kernel might refuse to offline a few LMBs that are part of that device.
> In such cases, we will have a DIMM device that
On 09/04/2015 10:33 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Fontenot (2015-09-03 13:50:59)
>> On 09/01/2015 10:28 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:01:51AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>>> The hash table size allocated to guest depends on the
On 09/01/2015 10:28 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:01:51AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> The hash table size allocated to guest depends on the maxmem size.
>> If the host isn't able to allocate the required hash table size but
>> instead allocates less than the optimal
On 08/03/2015 12:35 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
Don't represent non-hotluggable memory under drconf node. With this
we don't have to create DRC objects for them.
The effect of this patch is that we revert back to memory@ representation
for all the memory specified with -m option and
23, 2014 at 06:30:17AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
From: Nathan Fontenot nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 25 +
1 file changed, 25
On 09/04/2014 11:34 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
Quoting Michael Roth (2014-09-04 11:12:15)
Quoting Bharata B Rao (2014-09-04 10:08:20)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
+static int spapr_device_hotplug_add(DeviceState *qdev, PCIDevice *dev)
+{
+
On 08/26/2014 06:36 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.08.14 02:21, Michael Roth wrote:
From: Mike Day ncm...@ncultra.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Day ncm...@ncultra.org
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 119
On 08/26/2014 04:12 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 08/19/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I have totally no idea what this patch actually does :) When is this rtas
call made? Once after the guest received the check exception
17 matches
Mail list logo
