Hello Anthony,
Monday, September 3, 2007, 11:44:13 PM, you wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 18:41 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 9/2/07, Maria Zabolotnaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2-qemu-mplugin.patch
Add -mplugin switch to allow loading of shared library and registering a
machine declared in
Hello Andrzej,
Saturday, July 28, 2007, 1:08:46 AM, you wrote:
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
[]
Log message:
Optionally setup old style linux bootparams for -kernel, by Juergen
Lock.
With such kind of options being merged, any chance that my
old patch to override ARM
Hello Paul,
Friday, July 27, 2007, 12:25:13 PM, you wrote:
The embedded space contains a vast number of boards, often only
different by what devices are use, where they are located, etc.
Building a new version of qemu for each board would be burdensome.
The hope would be that we
Hello,
Andrzej Zaborowski wrote:
There is some interesting work being done on a similar project by Paul
Sokolovsky for his and Maria Zabolotnaya's Google Summer Of Project.
Yes, there's such project, being done from Handhelds.org, with the
motivation that the project works on porting Linux
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 6:01:48 PM, you wrote:
Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
why Linux has dynamic-loadable modules support, which clueless passers-by
like me call
Hello Rob,
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 11:01 am, Paul Brook wrote:
Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
why Linux has
Hello Paul,
Ummm, I must be representing my ideas somewhat unclear... ;-)
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 3:08:20 AM, you wrote:
[]
Thanks for your response. But I hope none of us take the discussion
too seriously to consider the arguments like above are all-convincing.
They can be
Hello Rob,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 2:28:47 AM, you wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 9:38 pm, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Maybe. But where are new chips in qemu? Why there're still only 2
ARM boards? How do I stick wi-fi card in one of them? So the concern
is not just if it's easy to add
Hello Paul,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:29:52 PM, you wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 21:01, Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 2:27 pm, Paul Brook wrote:
I've been considering a machine config file for a while, but haven't come
up with a coherent way of representing everything
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 9:38:57 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 19:27, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
[]
Of course when using qemu the syscalls thatqemu emulates tend to be more
important than the host kernel version. By default qemu will report the same
version
Hello S.P.T.Krishnan,
Sunday, August 20, 2006, 6:23:11 PM, you wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the direction.
I am just thinking. If I run a guest OS once and observe the blocks
that are translated and may be reused. Then I again re-run the OS,
can I expect the same blocks are translated
Hello Tieu,
Do you think that posting same long mail several times will get you more answers than careful reading of docs/some thought? ;-)
Wednesday, August 9, 2006, 11:31:51 AM, you wrote:
Hi all,
I ran successfully Qemu to simulate ARM system on Linux host with the following
Hello Andrzej,
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:29:41 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello qemu-devel,
I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on
the list by Andrzej Zaborowski
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006
13 matches
Mail list logo
