ping http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/786393/
~Theodore
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Theodore Dubois wrote:
>
> Clang's assembler is slightly incompatible with GCC's assembler, which
> caused the program to not compile on Clang for these reasons:
>
> - The &quo
I don’t believe so, I haven’t been able to find it in the bug database.
~Theodore
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2017 22:57, Theodore Dubois wrote:
>> - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
>
> Has this bug been reported?
>
> Paolo
>
ess.
- The arguments to the bound instruction are in the wrong order on
Clang. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27653
Signed-off-by: Theodore Dubois
---
tests/tcg/test-i386.c | 20
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c b/tes
In include/exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h, there’s references to
glue(glue(ld, USUFFIX), _p), which would expand to a call to a function looking
something like uint32_t lduw_p(void *) (for example). Where is this function
defined?
~Theodore
Hi, I’ve got a question about the addend field in the TLB. Why use this instead
of a pointer to the host page? I would think the speed difference would be
unmeasurable.
~Theodore
