RE: [PATCH] disas/nanomips: Convert nanoMIPS disassembler to C

On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 10:18, Peter Maydell wrote: > ... > Is it possible to break this down into smaller pieces so it isn't one single > enormous 5000 line patch ? > > I guess partial conversion is likely to run into compilation difficulties > mid-series; if so we could do "disable the

RE: What to do with the nanomips disassembler (was: [PATCH] disas: Remove libvixl disassembler)

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:34AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 09/06/2022 16.15, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> On 6/9/22 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>> On 6/9/22 10:57, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:47:24AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 08/06/2022 17.51, Paolo Bonzini

RE: [PATCH] Revert "elf: Relax MIPS' elf_check_arch() to accept EM_NANOMIPS too"

RE: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

tant technology for us, and QEMU is one of the key projects we want to have nanoMIPS supported in. -Vince Del Vecchio Compiler Team Lead & Deputy Director, DSP Core Technology, MediaTek

RE: [PATCH-for-5.2] target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA

andar Markovic, both from Syrmia) to help us in this process if needed. To sum up, nanoMIPS is alive and in active development, so based on your criteria it should remain supported in QEMU. Please let us know how else we can help with this process. -Vince Del Vecchio Compiler Team Lead & Deputy Director, DSP Core Technology MediaTek, Inc.

RE: [PATCH-for-5.2] target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA