On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:18 PM LIU Zhiwei wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> I think that this bug has been resolved in my packed-extension patch set[1].
>
> Would you mind to have a test and merge it before the whole patch set?
Great! Thanks
I have applied patch 3 for the next PR.
Alistair
>
>
Hi Alistair,
I think that this bug has been resolved in my packed-extension patch set[1].
Would you mind to have a test and merge it before the whole patch set?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Zhiwei
[1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg782125.html
On 2021/4/15 上午11:57,
Add Frank, he is the SiFive's qemu maintainer.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:57 AM Alistair Francis wrote:
>
> + LIU Zhiwei and Kito Cheng
>
> Alistair
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:31 AM Tony Cole <1923...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> >
> > Public bug reported:
> >
> > I noticed doing a negate ( 0
+ LIU Zhiwei and Kito Cheng
Alistair
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:31 AM Tony Cole <1923...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> Public bug reported:
>
> I noticed doing a negate ( 0 – 0x8000 ) using vssub.vv produces an
> incorrect result of 0x8000 (should saturate to 0x7FFF).
>
> Here is the
Public bug reported:
I noticed doing a negate ( 0 – 0x8000 ) using vssub.vv produces an
incorrect result of 0x8000 (should saturate to 0x7FFF).
Here is the bit of the code:
vmv.v.i v16, 0
…
8f040457vssub.vvv8,v16,v8
I believe
