[PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-10-12 Thread Peter Maydell
Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer) suggested that we do this in 2019: https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead milkymist project. (The Linux port to lm32 was neve

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-09-23 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 08:55, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote: > > @@ -416,6 +416,14 @@ The above, converted to the current supported format:: > > linux-user mode CPUs > > > > > > +``lm32`` CPUs (since 5.2.0) > > +''' >

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-09-23 Thread Thomas Huth
On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote: > Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer) > suggested that we do this in 2019: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html > because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead >

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-31 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Le jeu. 27 août 2020 16:51, Thomas Huth a écrit : > On 27/08/2020 16.19, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial > >> fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has b

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-31 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Le jeu. 27 août 2020 14:07, Michael Walle a écrit : > Am 27. August 2020 13:32:59 MESZ schrieb Peter Maydell < > peter.mayd...@linaro.org>: > >Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 > >maintainer) > >suggested that we do this in 2019: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-d

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Thomas Huth
On 27/08/2020 16.19, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote: >> What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial >> fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has been >> added, as far as I can see ... is anybody still using

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote: > What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial > fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has been > added, as far as I can see ... is anybody still using it? I was never very clear on how much use mo

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Thomas Huth
On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote: > Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer) > suggested that we do this in 2019: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html > because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead >

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Michael Walle
Am 27. August 2020 13:32:59 MESZ schrieb Peter Maydell : >Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 >maintainer) >suggested that we do this in 2019: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html >because the only public user of the architecture is the many

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:32:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer) > suggested that we do this in 2019: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html > because the only public user of the architecture is

[PATCH] Deprecate lm32 port

2020-08-27 Thread Peter Maydell
Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer) suggested that we do this in 2019: https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead milkymist project. (The Linux port to lm32 was neve