Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer)
suggested that we do this in 2019:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead
milkymist project. (The Linux port to lm32 was neve
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 08:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > @@ -416,6 +416,14 @@ The above, converted to the current supported format::
> > linux-user mode CPUs
> >
> >
> > +``lm32`` CPUs (since 5.2.0)
> > +'''
>
On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer)
> suggested that we do this in 2019:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
> because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead
>
Le jeu. 27 août 2020 16:51, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> On 27/08/2020 16.19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial
> >> fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has b
Le jeu. 27 août 2020 14:07, Michael Walle a écrit :
> Am 27. August 2020 13:32:59 MESZ schrieb Peter Maydell <
> peter.mayd...@linaro.org>:
> >Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32
> >maintainer)
> >suggested that we do this in 2019:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-d
On 27/08/2020 16.19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial
>> fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has been
>> added, as far as I can see ... is anybody still using
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 14:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
> What's next? moxie? ... apart from the tree-wide clean-ups and trivial
> fixes, moxie did not have any major updates since 2013 when it has been
> added, as far as I can see ... is anybody still using it?
I was never very clear on how much use mo
On 27/08/2020 13.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer)
> suggested that we do this in 2019:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
> because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead
>
Am 27. August 2020 13:32:59 MESZ schrieb Peter Maydell
:
>Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32
>maintainer)
>suggested that we do this in 2019:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
>because the only public user of the architecture is the many
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:32:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer)
> suggested that we do this in 2019:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
> because the only public user of the architecture is
Deprecate our lm32 target support. Michael Walle (former lm32 maintainer)
suggested that we do this in 2019:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg605024.html
because the only public user of the architecture is the many-years-dead
milkymist project. (The Linux port to lm32 was neve
11 matches
Mail list logo